I love all the comments, folks! I feel like I should say that I don't at all object to popular books. I write about comic books and romance novels for a living. My favorite thing about the new X-Men movie was how yummy Michael Fassbender looked (I'm linking because it seems gratuitous to to put his picture on the blog again--I can pause while you go look, though). So, I went into this book ready to be won over.
And here's the thing--if it had only been about the white women (what is up with Celia Foote? Will it be a good reveal? I'm fascinated by her? And I'm findind Hilly deliciously awful), the book would be bearable. Stockett writes well. I want to know what's going to happen to these women.
But it's not just about the white women. It's about the black women as well. And the biggest problem I'm having so far is (I'm about 6 or 7 chapters in) that these women, who are speaking to us from inside their heads, are speaking as if they are talking to white women. Aibileen calling Jackie O "Miss Jackie" inside her head, Minny needing Celia to act like the other white women--it's like Stockett hasn't given these black women any space outside of the gaze of their white employers. I don't feel like I'm getting to know them. I feel like I'm watching a performance for my benefit.
So, the verdict so far: I no longer want to gouge my eyes out, but they may fall out of my head from all the eyerolling. And, also, what does she say in the afterword? It's taking all the willpower I have not to skip ahead and look.
SOME WHERE OUT THERE ARE PEOPLE JUST LIKE US--AFROGEEKS: BLACK PEOPLE WHO LOVE BUFFY AND STARS WARS, WHO HAVE THEIR OWN FOLDER AT THE COMIC BOOK SHOP, WHO THOUGHT LIVING COLOUR (THE BAND, NOT THE SHOW) WAS THE BOMB, WHO ALWAYS WANTED TO KNOW WHERE THE BLACK ELVES WERE IN D&D. AND NOW WE HAVE KIDS.
Showing posts with label reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reviews. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 08, 2011
Tuesday, June 07, 2011
Really people? The Help?
When I'm on a plane or at a party and people ask what I do and I reply, "I'm an English professor," I get one of two reactions: either the person will start apologizing for their grammar (it's too much trouble to tell people that I'm a lit professor and really couldn't care less about their grammar) or they will ask what I'm reading. For those of you who don't know English profs, let me clue you in a little secret: I'm rarely going to be reading anything you're remotely interested in. (Except lately I'm reading tons of romance novels, but that's a story for another day). The last two books I got excited about were What Was African American Literature? by Kenneth Warren (which was nonsense) and Pym, a novel by Mat Johnson (which was so so good, but probably only if you've also read Poe's Pym). I never get around to reading the "latest" novel until everyone has moved well past it, which brings me to today's topic: The Help.
I agreed to lead a book discussion on the The Help because I'd intended to read the book anyway and I love a good book discussion. One chapter in, though, and I want to gouge my eyes out. You want it not to revel in tired, uncomplicated, misleading stereotypes. But how can it do anything else when it includes these unironic lines:
To be fair, I've only read one chapter. Maybe it gets better.
I agreed to lead a book discussion on the The Help because I'd intended to read the book anyway and I love a good book discussion. One chapter in, though, and I want to gouge my eyes out. You want it not to revel in tired, uncomplicated, misleading stereotypes. But how can it do anything else when it includes these unironic lines:
Fact, [Miss Leefolt] whole body be so full a sharp knobs and corners, it's no wonder she can't soothe that baby. Babies like fat. Like to bury they face up in your armpit and go to sleep. They like big fat legs too. That I know.And of course she knows because she's fat black woman who has raised 17 white children. Good lord, people, have we really not moved past this? Am I really reading a New York Times bestseller about a mammy?
To be fair, I've only read one chapter. Maybe it gets better.
Wednesday, June 01, 2011
Race at Spoleto (or, David Mamet is Full of It)
I think I should preface the snark that follows with this: (1) It occurs to me that the only plays I've seen in Charleston have been at the College of Charleston, which is a very particular (and quite nice) theater-going experience. When you're in the Emmett Robinson, a guy comes out before the performance and tells you that the doors will be closed until intermission. No one comes in or out. If you leave at intermission and don't make it back before the door closes again, you're out of luck. (2) I really enjoyed Pure Theater's performance of Mamet's play Race. It's just that the experience was surreal.
So Morgan and I show up at 5:30 for the 6:00 performance of Race. We were surprised to find the theater in a strip mall next to East Bay Deli (Morgan would point out here that she felt like we were marching to our deaths, but she's prone to exaggeration). Because we were there so early, we got to observe some great theater even before the play started:
Two more Spoleto events to go.
So Morgan and I show up at 5:30 for the 6:00 performance of Race. We were surprised to find the theater in a strip mall next to East Bay Deli (Morgan would point out here that she felt like we were marching to our deaths, but she's prone to exaggeration). Because we were there so early, we got to observe some great theater even before the play started:
- the theater itself was roughly the size of my bedroom, maybe a little bigger (but not by much). Morgan decided it used to be a check cashing place. Whatever it was in its former life, the building now serves as a really intimate theater experience.
- the play's director greeted people at the door, lovely and warm and inviting, in the biggest summer straw hat I've ever seen. She seemed to be in love with this hat--she caressed it and took it off her head to look at it and showed it to other people. When she introduced the play, she took a moment to talk about the hat. Reading this over, it doesn't surround surreal. But trust me, it was.
- Everyone in the theater seemed to know to bring something to drink. Nearly everyone had a bottle of water. Except for those people who had cups of wine. I kid you not. Cups of wine. Morgan and I spent a long time trying to figure out where this wine came from and how it was legal to carry it from wherever it came from into the theater.
- The couple behind us were having a *horrible* vacation. The wife was annoyed at her hotel accomodations. She was hot. The play started 5 minutes late. She thought it was stupid. And her husband had no sympathy. I know all of this because she talked *through the entire play.* Morgan is convinced the guy next to us texted his mistress throughout the performance.
- The couple in front of us, competing with Morgan and me for the "Youngest People in the Room" title, were clearly early in their relationship. She was definitely into the play and he clearly was expecting sex for his patience.
- At one point a guy came from behind the stage with two boxes of leftover doughnuts, to toss them out. The director told him to keep them because once they get old, they get hard and shellack and you can use them as props. She said all of this while fondling her giant hat.
- The same guy came out again with a ladder, climbed it and tapped on a ceiling tile a few times. He then took the ladder backstage and returned a second time with it and a flashlight. Under the guidance of three gentleman in the front row, he shined a light into the tile for a few minutes. Apparently the tapping worked.
- The bathroom was behind the stage. Behind the stage!
Two more Spoleto events to go.
Friday, March 06, 2009
More Happiest Toddler on the Block
I realize that I didn't fully explain the fast-food rule. I don't have the book sitting in front of me, but I'll give it try anyway.
Basically Karp argues that you talk to an upset toddler (or any upset person, of whatever age) as if it were a fast-food exchange. When you are the the drive-thru and order a #3 with extra pickles, the guy inside repeats your order back to make sure he's got it right before telling you what the total is. He doesn't speak until he's sure you're done speaking and that he's heard you correctly.
So, in the case of your toddler (or mine), when the kid is upset, instead of saying "It's okay, it's okay" while they are hysterical, repeat back to them what they are saying (in toddler-ese). They get to speak first because they are upset. You should also hit their "sweet spot," mirroring back their emotions, maybe ratcheted down a notch or two. So be sad when your little one is sad, be angry or scared when they are. Your little one, if this works right, recognizes that you hear them and empathize and then they calm down enough to hear what you have to say. When it's your turn to speak, you can remind them of the rule they just broke or distract or give them an alternative or whatever else you need to do diffuse the situtation. In Cate's case, sometimes just calming down is enough to diffuse the situation. Karp reminds us that these are the kind of interactions we have with our toddlers when they are excited. He gives the example of a kid who climbs to the top of the slide by herself for the first time. We let her express her enthusiasm first and we mirror that enthusiasm, in toddler-ese ("You climbed up! All the way! Yay!") before we then take our turn ("I'm so proud of you.")
A typical exchange here goes something like this:
Cate (hysterically crying because Frances won't let her stand in front of the sink to brush her teeth): I want to brush my teeth! I want to brush my teeth! Frances is breaking my feelings!
Me (getting down to her level): What's wrong Cate?
Cate: I was brushing and Frances won't let me. I want to brush my teeth. Frances is mean. She broke my feelings.
Me (with a sad voice): You want to brush your teeth?
Cate: Yes.
Me: Catie sad? Sad sad Catie?
Cate: Hmm hmm.
Me: Why don't we wait to for Frances to finish and then we can take our turn.
Cate: Okay.
On other mornings, there would be hysterical tears and yelling the whole time we're getting ready as I try to explain to Cate that she can just wait her turn or get her to brush her teeth in the other bathroom. Now, it's brief exchange in which I get her to calm down and we move on.
We're about a week into our campaign to get Cate to act like human child and not wild animal and it's going well. We are now adding in some of Karp's time-in suggestions and those are going well to.
Again, in my pre-Cate life I the very idea of reading a book to figure out how to raise your kid was just plain silly and wrong-headed. And, again, I'm not sure these tricks would have worked with Frances (Frances *hated* baby talk and responded, still does, best when you talked to her reasonably and truthfully), but this book is really helping with Cate.
Basically Karp argues that you talk to an upset toddler (or any upset person, of whatever age) as if it were a fast-food exchange. When you are the the drive-thru and order a #3 with extra pickles, the guy inside repeats your order back to make sure he's got it right before telling you what the total is. He doesn't speak until he's sure you're done speaking and that he's heard you correctly.
So, in the case of your toddler (or mine), when the kid is upset, instead of saying "It's okay, it's okay" while they are hysterical, repeat back to them what they are saying (in toddler-ese). They get to speak first because they are upset. You should also hit their "sweet spot," mirroring back their emotions, maybe ratcheted down a notch or two. So be sad when your little one is sad, be angry or scared when they are. Your little one, if this works right, recognizes that you hear them and empathize and then they calm down enough to hear what you have to say. When it's your turn to speak, you can remind them of the rule they just broke or distract or give them an alternative or whatever else you need to do diffuse the situtation. In Cate's case, sometimes just calming down is enough to diffuse the situation. Karp reminds us that these are the kind of interactions we have with our toddlers when they are excited. He gives the example of a kid who climbs to the top of the slide by herself for the first time. We let her express her enthusiasm first and we mirror that enthusiasm, in toddler-ese ("You climbed up! All the way! Yay!") before we then take our turn ("I'm so proud of you.")
A typical exchange here goes something like this:
Cate (hysterically crying because Frances won't let her stand in front of the sink to brush her teeth): I want to brush my teeth! I want to brush my teeth! Frances is breaking my feelings!
Me (getting down to her level): What's wrong Cate?
Cate: I was brushing and Frances won't let me. I want to brush my teeth. Frances is mean. She broke my feelings.
Me (with a sad voice): You want to brush your teeth?
Cate: Yes.
Me: Catie sad? Sad sad Catie?
Cate: Hmm hmm.
Me: Why don't we wait to for Frances to finish and then we can take our turn.
Cate: Okay.
On other mornings, there would be hysterical tears and yelling the whole time we're getting ready as I try to explain to Cate that she can just wait her turn or get her to brush her teeth in the other bathroom. Now, it's brief exchange in which I get her to calm down and we move on.
We're about a week into our campaign to get Cate to act like human child and not wild animal and it's going well. We are now adding in some of Karp's time-in suggestions and those are going well to.
Again, in my pre-Cate life I the very idea of reading a book to figure out how to raise your kid was just plain silly and wrong-headed. And, again, I'm not sure these tricks would have worked with Frances (Frances *hated* baby talk and responded, still does, best when you talked to her reasonably and truthfully), but this book is really helping with Cate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)